I'm always delighted when a social trend report is released and crotchity journos get all bent out of shape about the results. They write op-eds like this one, crying out in horror about THE CURRENT STATE OF THE KIDS. Here, the study in question basically said people don't go out on dates anymore.
Well, d'uh. We knew this. As a twenty-one-year-old, I can count on one hand the number of times I've been on a real "date." (Keep your rude comments to yourself.)
Charles Blow, the writer of this op-ed, seems baffled by this new trend, which is surprising because his picture indicates he is not, as you might think, an older brother of Methuselah, living underground since Alexander the Great came of age. To help him out of his cloud of confusion, he consults several experts, who I am sure explained to him in measured tones that these days, people hang out in groups. Formal courtship is a thing of the past. Girls don't get pinned. Boys don't give their letter jackets to their cotillion dates. Parental involvement is a no-go until an exclusive couple has been together for many, many moons. In his last sentence, I think the writer indicates he wants to instigate some sort of dating movement to bring Generation Y back into the dinner-and-a-movie days of yore. Those days do sort of sound like fun.
So I feel a little torn. Right now, relationships and dating are low on my list of priorities. I am not a swoony type, and usually, my friends make better conversation than suitors (no offense, hotcakes). But, ladies, what will happen when we are young professionals? What if, say, I move to Omaha and I'm responsible for finding a steady lover and new set of friends? How does one do that, exactly? I'd hate to be that awkward girl at the office trying to make friends with everyone within shouting distance of her cubicle.
This topic came up when I was talking with Lynda the other day, and we came up with few answers. We wondered if we'll have to sign up for online dating. It's certainly something that has shed its stigma, and attracted tens of millions of eligible singles (and also thousands of creepos and cheaters). Online dating just seems like unfamiliar, undesirable terrain to us; we teens and twentysomethings never been the target demographic for sites like Match.com and EHarmony. You see, we've been too busy signing the Devil's book, hanging out in groups, and macking on strangers we've only just met. In our future as "grown-ups" though, I suppose online dating could be a reasonable option, but then of course we'll have to meet these people on REAL DATES. If nothing else, that should make Blow happy.
What do we think about this? Am I being paranoid; have I been jaded by the college experience of non-committal group hangouts and informal tonsil hockey sessions? Personally, the resurgence of the old-fashioned date sounds sweet to me. Imagine, going somewhere together, and actually engaging someone in conversation. Conversely, there is something to be said for these new, hip methods of dating that the NYT exposed through its vigorous reporting. Hanging out with friends, etc., is a whole heck of a lot of fun, and meeting potential lovahs in that sort of situation is ideal. You can be introduced by mutual friends (character witnesses), and if conversation doesn't take off, you have a quick out.
So I don't know. Should we heed Charles Blow's oddly-timed and out-of-touch clarion call, harken back to the days of John Cusack's Lloyd Dobler, and actually call someone up for a date? Or should we relish in our revolutionary ways and continue playing it casual, sometimes to the point of absurdity?
Most of all, I think writers should stop balking at survey data that indicates trends we've known about forever. And also, someone should buy me dinner.